Chapter 1: Revisiting Hyperloop

Do you recall the excitement surrounding Hyperloop? Elon Musk's visionary concept promised to transform travel into a futuristic, hyper-efficient, and affordable experience. Yet, after a burst of media attention, it seems to have faded from public discourse. What really happened to Musk's ambitious idea? Surprisingly, Hyperloop may resemble the fantastical elements of "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?" more than it does genuine technological advancement. Let’s delve into this notion.

For those who closely follow Musk’s ventures, this may not come as a shock. However, upon discovering this perspective, I felt compelled to share it. It appears that Hyperloop may have been more of a marketing tactic to boost Tesla sales than a serious transportation project.

Quick note: For more insights and to interact with me, consider following me on Bluesky.

Before diving deeper, let’s remind ourselves of what Hyperloop entails. Essentially, it is a high-speed train operating within a low-pressure tube, significantly minimizing air resistance and allowing the capsule to achieve remarkable speeds with minimal energy. The capsule glides on ultra-efficient air bearings, akin to those used in air hockey, and is propelled by a magnetic system similar to maglev trains. The design features a one-way tube with terminals serving as airlocks for passengers and goods.

Musk claims that Hyperloop can reach speeds of 800 mph, which would allow for a 30-minute journey from San Francisco to Los Angeles. He estimates the construction costs to be around $6 billion—a fraction of the projected $68 billion for a high-speed rail line between these cities. Furthermore, tickets for this journey could be priced at just $60, compared to approximately $90 for high-speed rail.

It sounds like the ideal solution, right? An efficient, cost-effective, and eco-friendly transportation option that makes conventional trains and air travel seem slow and pricey. But what's the catch?

The Catch: Hyperloop as a Strategic Distraction

It turns out, Hyperloop might have been a diversion. In 2017, Musk revealed to his biographer Ashlee Vance that the idea was partly aimed at stalling California's high-speed rail initiative. The most effective way to reduce carbon emissions in transportation is to shift away from cars. Electric trains and streetcars are proven to be safe, fast, affordable, and scalable. This is precisely why California was keen on developing a high-speed rail system akin to those in Europe and Asia.

However, such a project could potentially diminish Tesla's market share. Musk appears to have introduced Hyperloop to undermine support for California's rail system. The concept is crafted to seem more futuristic and efficient, leading lawmakers to delay high-speed rail in favor of a non-existent Hyperloop project. Consequently, travelers between these cities are left with no option but to purchase cars, thereby increasing Tesla's customer base, especially among those looking to reduce their carbon footprint.

These assertions stem from journalist Paris Marx, who collaborated with Vance to uncover this narrative. While definitive proof is elusive, there is ample circumstantial evidence to support this view. Paris is an excellent journalist, and I encourage you to check out their work on social media.

Where's the Evidence?

Musk has a history of promoting dubious solutions to pressing issues. For example, Tesla’s focus on self-driving vehicles overshadows the potential for efficient public transit alternatives like buses and trains. These options could provide similar experiences while being more space-efficient and scalable compared to Tesla's yet-to-be-realized robotaxis. Furthermore, the ambitious AI-driven Optimus robot has been met with skepticism from experts who highlight its impracticality.

Despite Tesla's significant investment in these initiatives, they often come off as speculative rather than grounded in reality. Musk's approach has raised questions about whether these projects are merely a façade to inflate Tesla's stock value. This notion was further fueled in 2021 when Musk opted for a cheaper vision-based self-driving system, disregarding the safer, more comprehensive technology favored by his engineers.

In essence, a pattern emerges where Musk manipulates markets to serve his interests.

When examining Hyperloop closely, it appears to be yet another example of market manipulation disguised as innovation. The concept has yet to progress beyond preliminary tests, achieving only 248 mph—still not surpassing high-speed rail speeds. Although theoretically capable of reaching Musk's claimed velocities, engineering challenges, particularly concerning safety, make implementation exceedingly difficult. For instance, the air-bearing technology designed to levitate the capsule poses significant risks at high speeds in low-pressure environments. A malfunction could lead to catastrophic failures.

The financial implications of building Hyperloop are also alarming. Musk's estimated $6 billion construction cost has been met with skepticism from experts like Richard White, a railway historian at Stanford, who asserts that this figure is grossly underestimated. The existing infrastructure and expertise for high-speed rail are already established, while Hyperloop lacks the same foundation. Establishing the necessary factories and training personnel will undoubtedly incur substantial costs.

Moreover, high-speed rail systems require less material and are less complex than Hyperloop, suggesting that the latter would ultimately be more expensive to construct. Yet, there’s still no evidence to support claims that Hyperloop would surpass high-speed rail in terms of speed or efficiency.

The Flaws in Hyperloop's Design

One critical flaw of Hyperloop is its inability to accommodate multiple stops. If a capsule halts, another capsule catching up could disrupt the system, creating a dangerous scenario. This limitation restricts the design to a linear model with only two stops, preventing the creation of a national network like that of trains. While potential solutions exist, they would require additional investment.

This aspect may actually play into Musk's strategy. The U.S. has a limited passenger rail network, resulting in heavy reliance on automobiles. A high-speed rail line from San Francisco to Los Angeles could serve as a catalyst for a broader network, fostering a new era of rail travel in America. By sabotaging such a project, Musk could maintain the country’s dependence on cars, thereby boosting Tesla's sales.

Musk's Misuse of Hyperloop Technology

Lastly, Musk has diverted funds intended for Hyperloop technology to develop tunneling machines, which, instead of being utilized for Hyperloop infrastructure, have been repurposed for a small tunnel allowing Tesla joyrides. This raises the question of whether Musk's ultimate goal is to promote Tesla rather than advance Hyperloop.

The potential vulnerabilities of Hyperloop, particularly concerning security, remain another unaddressed issue that would require rigorous measures akin to those in the aviation industry.

In conclusion, Hyperloop appears to be a clever distraction at best and a deeply concerning strategy at worst.

Historical Parallels

Interestingly, Musk is not the first to manipulate transportation technology for personal gain. In the 1940s, the rise of electric trains and streetcars threatened the American car industry. Corporations like Firestone and GM colluded to dismantle public transport options, forcing consumers toward gasoline-powered vehicles. This conspiracy ultimately stunted the growth of rail infrastructure in the U.S., leading to the flourishing high-speed rail systems seen in Europe and Asia today. This historical context inspired the narrative in "Who Framed Roger Rabbit," which remains relevant today.

While Musk's actions may not constitute an outright conspiracy, they certainly echo the tactics of those past industries seeking to expand their market share. By amplifying his message with extravagant claims, Musk has managed to obscure accountability, demonstrating a contradictory stance toward capitalism.

Thank you for reading! This type of content thrives on your support. To contribute to similar work or access early articles, consider following me and my project, Planet Earth And Beyond, on various platforms, including Google News and Flipboard, or connect with me on Bluesky.

(Originally published on PlanetEarthAndBeyond.co)

Sources: Time, Jalopnik, Escapist Magazine, NY Times, Frontiers, EESI, Tech Times, Boring Company

Chapter 2: The Reality of Hyperloop

In this video, "What's Happening (And Not Happening) With Hyperloop | Answers With Joe," we explore the current status of Hyperloop and its viability as a transportation solution.

In another insightful discussion, "Well There's Your Problem | Episode 150: The Death of Hyperloop," we analyze the challenges and criticisms surrounding Musk's ambitious project.