Plato’s Noble Lie — A Metaphor for Psychological Traits

He articulates this idea in the following manner:

“Though you are all brothers in the city, we will assert in our narrative that the divine has mixed gold into the lineage of those destined to govern, making them the most esteemed. Silver is found in the guardians, while iron and bronze are allocated to the farmers and craftsmen.”

(Plato, Republic III. 415a, translated by Harold North Fowler et al.)

While this notion can be unsettling if taken literally, Plato describes the fiction as:

“Nothing extraordinary… merely a form of Phoenician story, akin to events that have transpired in various regions, as poets claim and have led people to accept, even though such things may not have occurred and are unlikely to do so in our time, requiring significant persuasion to be accepted.”

(Plato, Republic III. 414c, translated by Harold North Fowler et al.)

However, if we interpret this myth through the lens of psychological tendencies or archetypes, some truths emerge. It is common knowledge that individuals are unique; no two people share identical interests, experiences, or passions. These substantial differences stem from our biological and psychological compositions.

Philosophical Disagreement: Driven by Disposition, Not Logic

I propose an argument that might be considered unpopular: the philosophical disagreements we encounter are largely a reflection of our psychological inclinations, shaped by our experiences and limited understanding. In other words, disagreements are often rooted in emotional conflicts rather than rational conflicts. This acknowledgment does not overlook the fact that reason is profoundly influenced by our emotional experiences.

While philosophy is ostensibly built on rational discussions, I question whether the reasons we provide are truly as logical as we like to think. Our justifications, interpretations, and efforts to find truth may be more about an irrational attachment or yearning, which we articulate in rational terms.

Some individuals may lean more towards skepticism, while others may favor virtue ethics over utilitarianism. This claim is largely based on anecdotal evidence, as there is little else to draw upon.

Why Disagreement Exists: Beyond Cultural Influences

Imagine a classroom filled with enthusiastic philosophy students. They are introduced to various ethical theories throughout the semester. Despite being exposed to the same material and instruction, each student’s response varies. It is natural to assume that they will adopt differing viewpoints, with some in agreement and others in opposition. When asked to justify their positions, their responses will differ, rooted in experiences that extend far beyond the classroom.

One could attribute these disagreements to individual differences; after all, no two people share the same life experiences. The multitude of variables involved is immense, and even a thorough analysis of someone’s past may not predict their beliefs when faced with new material or problems.

The field of philosophy is rich with diverse perspectives on fundamentally similar topics: the natural world and human experiences. Nothing is entirely novel; the world may appear in various forms, yet nothing is so unfamiliar as to be beyond comprehension.

While I hesitate to claim that specific historical contexts dictate philosophical developments (e.g., the Hellenistic 'Age of Anxiety' leading to Hellenistic Philosophy), I argue that certain enduring philosophies gain prominence in specific times and places. Existentialists, utilitarians, and absurdists have always existed.

Philosophical Belief: Rooted in Intuition

If we exclude context and personal experiences, what remains is a vague essence that manifests in our preferences and aversions. My stance is that our philosophical beliefs are shaped by innate intuitions—intuitions that can be described as 'aesthetic' and similar to the tastes and aversions we encounter in daily life.

However, I find it challenging to articulate a solid reason for my belief in this view.

The Apeiron Blog — Big Questions, Made Simple

Philosophy can often appear complex. To simplify your journey, we compile insightful articles, news, reading lists, and various free resources. To stay connected, follow us on Medium and subscribe to our free mailing list.