The Societal Implications of Cheap Production

While our smartphones and affordable clothing offer undeniable benefits, they also come with societal repercussions. The extensive labor required to create that shirt once supported many workers. Although innovations like the powered loom made fabric production drastically cheaper in the 19th century, they also displaced thousands of jobs. Concerns about technology's impact are not limited to workers; entire companies can become obsolete as well.

For instance, the Radio Corporation of America (RCA) was a leading firm for decades, evolving from radios to televisions and epitomizing high-tech innovation. However, when the industry shifted from vacuum tubes to solid-state technology, RCA struggled to adapt, ultimately disappearing as an independent entity by the 1980s. Blockbuster serves as a classic case of a business rendered irrelevant by technological advancements.

Despite these transformations, unemployment rates remain low, largely because new technologies have generated fresh job opportunities that compensate for those lost. Companies like Google, Microsoft, Apple, and Amazon now employ around 2 million individuals—jobs that didn't exist during RCA's heyday.

Will Job Creation Keep Pace with Automation?

Looking ahead, a critical question arises: will the jobs lost to technological advancements be balanced by the emergence of new roles we cannot yet envision? This topic remains a contentious issue in economic circles. Historically, we've observed cycles where automation leads to job loss, followed by the creation of entirely new job categories. However, the current situation feels distinct.

A few years ago, self-driving vehicles were a hot topic, but their implementation has proven more complex than anticipated, even though they remain on the horizon. As robotics advance, numerous roles in trucking and delivery may vanish, and even garbage collection could become automated. We already see prototypes of fully automated fast-food restaurants. Warehousing is likely to become entirely human-free. AI is even capable of generating basic news articles. The future landscape raises a troubling question: will any jobs remain for human workers?

The Critical Challenge of a Post-Labor Economy

This article explores the implications of a world where humans are largely unnecessary for the labor required to sustain the economy. While it may be feasible to minimize human involvement in capitalist operations, demand is the true engine of economic activity. Robots can manufacture goods, yet they do not engage in purchasing.

If we fail to proactively address this issue, we risk a dystopian future characterized by a small elite maintaining the system while a vast underclass survives on the periphery. This potential reality poses risks not only to society but also to the wealthy, as a populace living hand-to-mouth can foster unrest and violence directed at the elite.

The Solution: Universal Basic Income

The path to prevention is theoretically straightforward: implement a universal basic income (UBI). I recognize that the term “socialism” might trigger alarm for some, but this notion does not advocate for governmental control over the economy or the elimination of open markets. Instead, it envisions a market-driven economy supported by a guaranteed income.

A UBI sufficient to afford a modest, middle-class lifestyle would stimulate demand, keeping the economic engine running. This proposal would not entail an unqualified government handout; rather, it would represent a social contract funded by the wealthy, ensuring both economic and social stability to protect their interests. Recipients of the income could be required to contribute 15 to 20 hours of community service weekly.

Community service presents an opportunity to determine which roles we value human interaction in. Although AI could potentially manage remote learning environments, many would prefer human teachers. As automation displaces jobs, we could see an increase in roles in education, healthcare, and social services—areas where human touch is essential.

The Potential for a Better Society

Consider the positive societal impacts of such a system. Families could spend more time together, potentially reducing juvenile delinquency and crime rates. Many existing safety net programs—like food assistance—could become obsolete, as no one would need them. The reduction in anxiety about basic necessities would likely improve mental health for millions.

Participation in this program wouldn't be obligatory. Some may choose to work full-time in the private sector, earning more than the UBI. Others might opt for a combination of universal income and part-time work. This new framework could encourage entrepreneurship, as individuals would feel more secure taking risks without the fear of financial ruin.

Lessons from History

America has navigated similar challenges before. In the late 1800s, an unregulated capitalist environment led to monopolies and extreme wealth disparities alongside a struggling working class. This unrest fostered a burgeoning socialist movement, prompting reforms like worker safety laws and minimum wage legislation, which stabilized capitalism for the next century.

Today, we face another transformative economic shift that necessitates a national dialogue on how to ensure this new economy serves everyone.

Conclusion: The Need for Action

Implementing a functional system will undoubtedly be complex, with potential for individuals to exploit it. We may witness attempts to bypass community service obligations. However, the benefits of successfully addressing a post-labor economy are substantial, while the risks of neglecting it could be dire.

The economic transformation has already begun and will unfold over the next several decades. In a democracy, we have the power to shape an economic system that benefits all. If “we the people” fail to make this decision, corporate interests will make choices that serve them, not us.

This video explores the implications of AI on capitalism and whether it can endure in an era dominated by robots.

In this talk, Richard Freeman discusses the relationship between work, income, and the rise of AI and automation.