Understanding the Cognitive Biases in Critical Thinking
Written on
Chapter 1: The Misconception of Intelligence
Many individuals who pride themselves on their critical thinking skills often overlook three essential aspects: they blend inductive reasoning with an ability to connect various data points while favoring easily accessible facts.
To clarify, here are definitions of these terms:
- Inductive reasoning: A reasoning approach where broad conclusions are drawn from specific observations.
- Connecting the dots: The process of linking various factual pieces to arrive at a conclusion, which can sometimes lead to inaccuracies.
- Picking low-hanging facts: The tendency to select the simplest data points to support a conclusion, disregarding more complex or contradictory information.
Connecting the Dots Explained
Connecting the dots involves examining evidence thoroughly and following it to derive a logical conclusion. This process is akin to the childhood activity of linking numbered dots to reveal an image.
One challenge in this process is the potential for multiple interpretations of what constitutes "evidence." With strict deductive reasoning, it is possible for different individuals to arrive at identical conclusions. However, particularly in historical contexts, we often rely on subjective conclusions driven by inductive reasoning. This reasoning is exploited by those who deny historical events, like the Holocaust.
When asked to "connect the dots," one is encouraged to analyze available information and make an informed assumption. For instance:
If I share that my favorite animal is:
- Indigenous to Africa
- Large
- Grey
You might infer that I am referring to an elephant. However, this assumption could also lead to other possibilities, such as a hippopotamus, demonstrating the pitfalls of connecting dots solely based on easily observable data.
Delving Deeper
When engaging with scientific studies, peer-reviewed articles, and textbooks, connecting the dots means gaining a comprehensive understanding of the information by integrating it with existing knowledge. This involves considering insights from:
- Experts
- Researchers
- Historians
- Statisticians
- Scholarly footnotes
For example, if I investigate the poverty line set at $1.25 per day and discover that 45% of Canadians earn merely $1.16 daily, I can connect these data points to conclude that a significant portion of Canadians live below the poverty threshold.
In essence, this process requires synthesizing information to develop a clearer understanding, but this improved comprehension can reinforce existing cognitive biases.
Keng Lee offers a compelling perspective on this topic, drawing from his extensive research background. His insights have informed my work as a game theory strategist since the 1990s.
Three critical perspectives are continually at play:
- You draw upon your prior knowledge and experiences while engaging with a text or expert.
- You constantly recall previous materials, whether written, auditory, or visual, and cross-reference them with new information.
- You explore and reconcile the information with real-world applications or prototypes.
It is through these cognitive processes and intuitive insights that we achieve the act of "connecting the dots." However, one must remain vigilant about existing beliefs and potential biases.
Forming a Mastermind group of respected experts, particularly those with differing views, can help mitigate flawed conclusions drawn from seemingly solid evidence.
As a result of thorough research and varied experiences, you may identify patterns or threads that unify your knowledge.
A relevant case study involves an engineering associate fascinated by control systems, who reflected on "The Law of Requisite Variety," introduced by British cybernetics expert Ross Ashby. Simplified, it suggests that our adaptability and flexibility in learning enable us to creatively tackle challenges.
This perspective encourages us to seek alternative solutions when faced with adversity rather than passively accepting unfavorable situations.
Many of my friends express sympathy for my passion for critical thinking but often claim they lack the mental bandwidth to engage with individuals who selectively choose convenient facts to support their views.
In response, I emphasize the importance of pursuing what brings joy and meaning to life. For me, it's sharing knowledge that empowers others to make informed decisions. While I may not succeed in every instance, listening to differing viewpoints can be a form of meditation, even if some beliefs seem nonsensical.
A refined critical thinking skill set allows you to navigate life effectively. Recognizing that external events are part of a broader chain of causes and effects can transform your worldview. By understanding your role in the larger picture, you can see where your freedom lies and approach decision-making with greater awareness, reducing complaints about circumstances.
Reflect on the choices you've made in life—how have they shaped your current situation?
The Key Takeaway
A clear and structured thought process leads to a life characterized by reduced struggle and dissatisfaction. To achieve your goals, cultivate the ability to make predictions without clinging to specific outcomes. Understanding the Butterfly Effect within your cognitive framework will enable you to solve problems by recognizing underlying patterns of cause and effect.
About These Posts
These newsletters cover topics related to wealth creation, health, politics, culture, science, psychology, humor, and life—areas where I have cultivated expertise. In a world inundated with superficial information due to social media, these insights have become increasingly valuable.
Here are a few related articles:
@chuckbphilosophy
Conspiracies Are Real, And Your Mind is in on The Biggest One
The most significant conspiracy sabotaging you is the one playing out in your mind, often without your awareness.
@LewisCoaches
14 Tips On How The Mind Works
Tools for understanding historical contexts.
Connect with me on social media for tips, techniques, and insights to enhance your life.
The first video, "The Trouble with Bias - NIPS 2017 Keynote - Kate Crawford," discusses the challenges posed by cognitive biases in understanding data.
The second video, "Why We Can't Fix Bias with More AI w/ Patrick Lin," explores the limitations of using AI to address cognitive biases effectively.